Showing posts with label Tristar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tristar. Show all posts

Sunday, 2 January 2022

FEATURE: Another Crazy Year of Watch Buying

WAZ101A.FC8305

'Happy New Year' to all my readers, this post was supposed to be posted at the end of 2021, but due to me not being able to post my 'Buying Experience' for my blue F1 until I got it for Christmas I had to move it back a few days...

At the tail end of last year's 'Another Crazy Year of Watch Buying' (posted on the 29th Dec 2020), I said:

"Honestly though, I think this will probably be the last 'crazy' year for me. I've amassed so many watches now in a relatively short time that I've kinda 'got' most of what I want. There are things, obviously, that I would still like if they come up at reasonable prices; I'd love a 3000 Series chrono or perhaps a Super Professional and if a full size Tristar came available for sensible money I'd be up for that too. Sometimes I even look longingly at Executives, but usually the bracelets are too short and I'm willing to bet spare links for those are like hen's teeth!

Perhaps it's time to slow down and put a bit more thought into what I actually want, I can see that I've bought a couple of things this year that maybe I didn't really 'need' (if that's not too ridiculous a word to use in this context!) and I can see where I might decide to thin out the collection a bit in the not too distant future, because it's definitely getting a little out of hand."

No really, I actually said that... 

So, with that in mind, I guess it's time to take a look at the small number of carefully selected pieces that I picked up this year. 

Saturday, 17 April 2021

BUYING EXPERIENCE: TAG Heuer 2000 Tristar Quartz Watch

 
954.406

I've written about the Tristar two or three times since I started this blog; most recently to bemoan the fact that I had finally found one in decentish condition, only to realise at the last moment that it was in fact mid-size and not the full size model I had been hoping for! Indeed, every time I found a Tristar it always seemed to be a midsize model, to the point where I started to wonder if maybe that was a viable option for my 7.5/8" wrist (I think not). But then, just when I least expected it, and just when I had spent £1200 on my orange dial Formula 1 (obviously!) what should turn up on eBay but a full sized Tristar in excellent condition.

Every few weeks I check out the items 'Spirit*Age' has for sale, always hoping for one of the rarer classic Formula 1s to add to my collection. I've bought from him 4 or 5 times now and he has never disappointed me yet and he seems to get some of the cooler, harder to find pieces in good condition too. But I was very surprised to see that he had a Tristar and even more surprised when I checked out the number on the back and realised that it was a full size piece.


Annoyingly though, 'Spirit*Age' always lists his watches as auctions without the option to 'Buy It Now' and often they end in the middle of the night (in the UK) so it's a bit of a pain having to leave bids and waiting 'til the morning to see if you have won the item. Fortunately this one finished at 9PM UK time, so I was able to watch it until the end... as it happened (once again) I was the only bidder and so I secured the Tristar for the opening bid of £239.25. What a bargain; the midsize ones I found weren't much cheaper than that and apart from some wear to the gold on the end links, this one was easily the best condition of the ones I had come across.

The Tristar was a very short lived model, appearing in only two TAG Heuer catalogues (1987 & 1987/88), which perhaps explains why it's so hard to find them for sale. The piece is a sub-model of the 2000 range, sharing case and bracelet with other models but adding a unique bezel and dial... and unusually narrow hands. Indeed it's hard to say what exactly this model is supposed to be, it's clearly not a dive watch, nor is it a racing watch, but neither is it a dress watch... ,and what exactly was the inspiration behind the Tristar name and bezel? I've always thought the Tristar carried a very '1980s Soviet' aesthetic, but I'm sure that wasn't really the thought process of the designer.


The watch arrived ten days after the auction ended, which isn't bad from Japan and was consistent with my other purchases from 'Spirit*Age'. It certainly made a nice surprise to find it on my doormat when I arrived home from a day at the beach for my wife's 51st birthday, and bizarrely the last time I went to the beach I arrived home to find a similar package from 'Spirit*Age' so I did kinda wonder all day if it would turn up that day. 

My enthusiasm was slightly tempered though when I tried the watch on and realised that while the clasp closed around my wrist I really needed one more link for it to be comfortable. Fortunately, my two-tone 3000 had a spare link which looks identical. The only problem I had was that the split pin I had with that link was too small and it would fall out, but a quick trip to my local Timpsons resolved the problem and all for the price of a donation to their charity tin. 


The watch seems to work perfectly and it's quite comfortable on the wrist, certainly comparable to the 3000 Series... in fact yesterday I was driving and had to check under my sleeve to make sure I hadn't taken it off before I'd left the house, which tells you something! I really love the sparkling gold dial, which under artificial light looks completely silver from some angles, and again it's all in immaculate condition - unlike some of the dials I had seen on other eBay Tristars. The gold on the indices is great and the hands are clean too, but why are they so slender? It's actually quite hard to see the slim gold hands against the gold dial, not that it's impossible but compared to the massive, lumed hands we get today they aren't the most legible of hands that's for sure. There is, admittedly, a small mark on the glass which I didn't actually notice until I took a photograph of it, but it's not something I'll be replacing anytime soon.

The bezel is the thing that really sets the Tristar apart though and I'm sure it's probably the thing most people will either love or hate. Well, I'm not sure anyone would really 'love' it... even I don't 'love' it, it's patently quite ugly - but I like the watch as a whole and of course for me it's more something of a collection piece. Having said that, the bezel creates this illusion that it isn't quite round (even though it is) and so you get this kind of Patek Nautilus vibe from it.... well I do, hahaha. Maybe it's wishful thinking? 


All in all, I am super chuffed with my latest purchase, especially since I was able to resolve the bracelet issue without going hunting for links or pins. I couldn't really have asked for a better example of the Tristar, albeit the gaudy side of me would probably still jump if a black and gold 956.306 came up for sale. But what are the chances of finding one of those in good condition, really? Nine out of ten times whenever you see a coated black bracelet from the 1980s it looks absolutely battered - if only they had ceramic back then...

So with the Tristar crossed off my list I guess my next target has to be either a 'Titanium' or an 'Airline', but good Titaniums don't come cheap and I think the Airlines were 35mm, and of course they both came on bespoke bracelets, so that's something else one has to consider.... maybe I'll hunt down the rest of the classic Formula 1s first and worry about those later?

Tuesday, 5 January 2021

SPOTLIGHT ON: TAG Heuer Tristar Quartz Watch

 

956.313

The Tristar is, perhaps, the most overlooked TAG Heuer of all. But unlike the Titanium and the Executive (two other models often forgotten) the Tristar was never a Heuer, and is only available with a TAG Heuer logo on the dial. It appears in the 1987-1988 catalogue, but not the 1987 nor the 1988 ones and makes only one other appearance, in a 1988 Japanese leaflet which I wrote about some time ago. 

Let's be honest, it's not exactly a 'classic' and if there's one watch from the archives that's NEVER going to get the re-release treatment, then this is it. But I must admit, I do have a little bit of a fascination with it, particularly in this gold and black configuration.


I came across this one on eBay a couple of weeks ago (wrongly listed as a 356.313) and was immediately struck by the NOS condition. The watch was being sold by 'Japan.Premium.Shop' which is probably no great surprise, given the aforementioned Japanese leaflet. It looks pretty magnificent, but then the price was also pretty magnificent as well, approximately £912 ($1235).

On top of that you have to factor in import tax, which as I found out not so very long ago, can add a significant amount to the bill. I would presume somewhere between £300-400 for this one, making it very expensive indeed for me to buy it.


Unfortunately, or perhaps fortunately.... the 13 at the end of the model number signifies that this in fact a 'mid-size' piece, I'm guessing somewhere around 34mm. As you can tell the crown looks quite a decent size and if this was a full size watch that crown would be excessively large. It's a shame it's not a 956.306, but then I guess the price would be even higher.

And really, you can't quibble over the price when the watch is in this condition. Black and gold TAG Heuer's from the 80s don't come up all that often and when they do the condition is usually fairly poor. The black and gold is almost always worn away, especially on the bracelets - unfortunately they just weren't built to last back then.

As ever with the Tristar, the hands look a bit too small to me, but maybe that's because hands have got thicker in recent years, mainly to facilitate the application of more lume. They do look rather skinny though, especially since the bezel is quite chunky and 'Soviet-industrial' looking!


So perhaps it's not actually that surprising that when I revisited the item yesterday I found that the item was no longer for sale and had in fact been sold for the asking price. The seller did say that this is not the original box for the watch, but that it was included in the sale. I do rather wonder what this box did come with, as it looks quite a step up from the box I got with my steel 3000 Series. Perhaps this is the box the Golden Hours watches came in? I really don't know...

I'm going to keep looking for a Tristar, but it has to be full size for me. I'd prefer the black and gold, but I know the chances of finding a full size one in an acceptable condition are slim... so it will most likely end up being the more common two tone model with the silver face. One of those came up towards the end of last year, but again it was mid-size, so I had to let it go. 


If we are talking about supercool 80s black and gold TAG Heuers though, my dream watch would have to be a NOS full size 3000 Series. I don't think I've ever seen one of these for sale and Googling the part number brings up absolutely nothing of any use. This page is from the same Japanese leaflet I mentioned earlier and it also contains a black and gold 3000 Chronograph, which is also pretty gorgeous. 

Ah well, I can dream...

Monday, 2 November 2020

SPOTLIGHT ON: TAG Heuer Tristar Quartz Watch

 

954.413

This is another one of those eBay tales that could have been a huge disappointment had luck not intervened... I found this a few days ago with a starting bid of £150 and I got rather excited because spectacularly ugly as it is, there's something about the Tristar that appeals to me. Maybe it's because it looks like it was designed to be worn by a Soviet General, I really don't know... but I would like one, despite its obvious shortcomings (not least of which is the puny handset that looks completely out of place).


Admittedly the clasp looks like it needs some attention, but I was more concerned that the bracelet looks a lot like the one on my 3000 Series and knowing that availability of links for these is so scarce I contacted the seller to enquire about the wrist size it could accommodate. The next morning I got a polite response telling me that it was just over 8" plus the diving extension and that was me thoroughly invested and ready to bid.


Perhaps a little too invested, since I completely forgot to check the simplest of details, like the part number! This photo convinced me the watch was all good, I knew it would be on the smaller side because my 3000s are only about 38mm, again completely forgetting that watches generally look bigger in 'wristshots' than they do in real life.

Fortunately I was talking to a fellow enthusiast about my potential purchase and he sent me some info which had the part number in large text at the top of the page, drawing my attention to it.... hmm. 954.413.


For those not au fait with the TAG Heuer numbering system of the 80s and early 90s, it went like this:

Last two numbers - 08: Ladies watch
Last two numbers - 15: Large ladies watch
Last two numbers - 13: Boy's watch
Last two numbers - 06: Man's / full size watch

In my excitement and haste, I had overlooked the fact that this watch was actually a 'boys' watch, which I would estimate would be 34 or 35mm. Granted I am perfectly fine wearing a 34mm resin cased Formula 1, but that is because a) there are no larger options and b) the straps with the TAG Heuer shields on them seem to make those watches wear slightly larger than they are, perhaps also the colours help in this regard as well. 


As it happened a couple of days before the auction ended someone placed a bid, so I knew I wasn't going to get it for £150, and once I realised that the watch was smaller than I thought I started to look at it in a different light. Though I was relieved that my friend sent me the info that prevented another 'smaller than expected' purchase (oh yes, that has happened before!) I was also rather disappointed that I wasn't going to be adding a Tristar to my collection after all...

I guess the price should have been a red flag, but excitement and enthusiasm nearly got the better of me again - it just shows that sometimes a second pair of eyes on a potential purchase can be a very good thing indeed! In the end the watch had two bids and sold for £186, so I'm guessing if I had bid it would have gone into the low £200s... a bargain for an '06', but not for a '13' that would always be a little bit too small.

--- --- ---


I thought I found another TriStar on eBay a week later, but it turned out to be the exact same watch being re-sold (that scuffed up clasp is a dead giveaway). The seller took some better pictures and was upfront about the size, but wanted £299 for it!

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Tag-Heuer-Professional-tri-star-Rare-Model-Boxed/313279311367

Tuesday, 31 March 2020

SPOTLIGHT ON: TAG Heuer Tristar Quartz Watch

954.406

If you ever find yourself on the TV game show 'Pointless' and you get asked to name a TAG Heuer model range that nobody remembers, you really could do an awful lot worse than to answer 'Tristar'. As names go it's not one of the most 'evocative' TAG Heuer have ever used, indeed it doesn't really evoke much in the way of anything does it? Unlike Monaco or Monza (or even Aquaracer) it's a perfect example of literally 'doing what it says on the tin' as this watch has not one, not two, but (wait for it) three stars on the bezel. Well, actually that's not strictly true... there are actually twelve stars on the bezel, but clearly they are arranged in four groups of three, so I guess we'll let them off there...

The Tristar range first appears in the 1987 TAG Heuer catalogue (it's listed in the 2000 section as a 'special' in fact), but it's a natural extension of what was going on at the tail end of the 'Heuer' years and I could well believe it was already in development before the takeover occurred; have a look at the 3000s from around the mid 80s and you'll see what I mean. Not unlike the 3000s, the Tristar isn't a thing of 'conventional' beauty, but oddly I kinda like it for all it's 80s kitsch. There's something intrinsically 'Soviet' about this one; for sure it's the stars... but even those lines around the bezel have something of the old 'CCCP' about them.


The Tristar range came in four basic configurations; black and gold with a black dial, black and gold with a white dial (those two are definitely not going to be to everyone's liking!), standard 'two-tone' with a blue dial and this version which matches a 'two-tone' bracelet and case with a champagne dial.

Kudos to TAG Heuer, they've given the watch a matching champagne date wheel, but those hands look a little on the slender side to me. They're long enough, but rather too delicate for such a brutalist bezel don't you think?

I'm slightly surprised to read that this model is 40mm in diameter and I do rather wonder if they haven't included the crown in that measurement. Back in the 1980s 37mm / 38mm was more the standard, more's the pity as I'd love a 41mm black and gold 3000 for example!

I actually really like the old 1980s watches with the black and gold finishes, but I'm yet to see one that's in good condition. 80s black PVD isn't the hardiest of coatings and watches that are pushing 35 years old and which have been worn generally look a bit of a mess, what I really need is a NOS piece... albeit I'm sure one of those would cost a pretty penny!


Speaking of which, this watch is exactly that, a 'new-old-stock' piece complete with hang-tag and box (no pics of the box though...) in 'as-new' condition. I found this one on eBay.it, and it's currently offered at 636 Euros (reduced from it's original price of 795 Euros).

I think this is the kind of watch that deserves a decent price, but one that needs to find the right buyer. Obviously, this isn't going to appeal to a lot of people and many wouldn't want this at any price, but someone will and I reckon they'll probably get something close to that price if they wait long enough. If it genuinely is 40mm I wouldn't mind it myself, but whether I like it enough to part with my savings in these rather uncertain times... I don't think so, unfortunately.

If by some random chance you might be the right person to take it off the seller's hands, here's the link to the sale: https://www.ebay.it/c/719611885